The structure is the "skeleton" that holds the various parts of the task together in the right relationship to each other. do my paper To create good coherence and flow, it is important to understand the function of the different chapters about each other. Everything you write in the thesis must fulfill a purpose. Here you get advice on what the different chapters in an assignment should contain, with emphasis on their function.

Check out some more writers at premium essay writing service.

There are many ways to structure a task. Early in the study, it is common to "explain and discuss" tasks. In health sciences and natural sciences, the IMRaD model (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion) is used. In the social sciences and humanities, one is freer.

A good task is characterized by that

• All questions raised are answered or elucidated

• The reader understands where the author wants at all times

• Everything that is explained has a function

• The theory is used to analyze/interpret data (if relevant)

• The method chapter is concrete

• The findings come into their own

• The discussion brings together empiricism, theory, and method

• The conclusion follows from what has been said

One thing at a time

To be able to write effectively and in a structured way, it is important to distinguish between different types of writing actions such as explanation, interpretation, analysis, and discussion or discussion. Consider one thing at a time, and avoid confusing the statement and discussion in the same statement. This way you get a more neat text.

In a theoretical assignment, argumentation and discussion are central. You can either discuss ideas and concepts along the way or separate the discussion (discussion) into a separate chapter. The latter is most common in empirical problems. In any case, make sure that you do not explain and discuss in the same turn.

Check out some more writers Content Writing Service

It is also important to signal what is the reproduction of others' ideas and what is your interpretation and argumentation. This is how you help the reader to follow your reasoning and show that you can make reservations where necessary. This is part of the researcher role's ideal of reflexivity and objectivity.

Reverse disposition

If you are wondering if your text has a clear structure, you can "tag" the paragraphs, for example with Post-it notes. Write down the point from each paragraph in the form of keywords. If the paragraphs have more than one point, consider splitting them or moving the content. What belongs together (logically) should also stand together.

Then you can look at the context. Are the points in the correct order? Is there anything that needs to be moved? Use the Post-it notes and try your hand at it.

In an empirical thesis, discussion normally comes after an account and brings together what has been said (background, theory, method, and findings). Sometimes the discussion is called discussion (from the English "discussion"). See more about discussion under the IMRaD model.

Based on the discussion, you can conclude (the conclusion is a type of conclusion). Conclusions must be valid, that is, they must follow logically from what they are based on. In empirical, quantitative problems, we then talk about validity.

Section structure: The TUR model

Below is a simple "recipe" for argumentation in a paragraph. The formula can also be used in non-argumentative paragraphs. Remember, however, that writing well does not mean following a specific recipe, but using recipes, role models, etc. as inspiration to shape your expression.

Theme - what is this about?

The first thing that needs to be clarified when you are going to argue is what it is about, ie the topic. The first sentence in a paragraph should therefore be a "theme sentence" that shows what the paragraph is about. The theme sentence can be a statement, or it can lead to a statement that you then have to elaborate on and justify.

Elaboration - how and why

In an academic text, it is expected that allegations are substantiated and substantiated. In English, the term evidence is used. Evidence can be either empirical data (research data, surveys, facts, and verifiable statements) or theoretical justifications. Allegations that are not substantiated can also not be discussed, but fall under the category «perception». In the discussion, it is usually the reasons that are discussed - are they good or bad? Are there other possible explanations? To investigate this, it can be very useful to refer to examples.

Relevance - what is this example of?

The relevance of an argument becomes clearest when you use examples. Through examples, you can show how you understand the topic in practice, and you can include nuances that are evoked in the reader in the form of recognition and associations. A well-chosen example can thus save you a lot of extra explanation. Another way to show relevance is by concluding.

Theme - Elaboration - Relevance

We then get the following formula: Theme, Elaboration and Relevance, TOUR. The relevance statement in a paragraph can be a springboard to the next paragraph, which in turn starts with a new theme. Thus, the text can be built up through several sections that follow the formula T1-UR, T2-UR, etc.

Check out some more writers Resume Writing World

Many of the sections on this page are examples of TUR.

Exercise

Read five sections in an introductory book from the syllabus, and see how many of these follow the TUR formula.

How to get a good structure?

Behind any text that has a good structure, there is a lot of work. write a paper for me In this film, you can see and hear Professor Ingvild Sælid Gilhus talk about how she works with revising text.